Articles Posted in Do I Have A Case?

A car accident in Kentucky can lead to life-changing consequences. Victims may face physical injuries, emotional trauma, medical bills, loss of income, property damage, among other challenges. It is strongly recommended that you seek legal help to navigate these complex issues. Mehr Fairbanks Trial Lawyers is well equipped to provide this much-needed assistance. Reasons Why…

At Mehr Fairbanks Trial Lawyers, we understand the wide range of homeowners and commercial property damage claims that people often encounter. Some of the most common insurance claims involve losses due wind, hail, water, or fire. These common scenarios often result in distressing losses. Wind Damage Wind can cause severe damage to a property, particularly…

If you have been involved in a car accident that was not your fault, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries, including medical bills, lost wages, property damage to your vehicle, and pain and suffering. But how do you know whose fault the collision was? If the other driver ran a red light…

Your insurance company may not be paying all the recoverable depreciation you are owed on your homeowners insurance claim. If you have had property damage at your home and received an insurance claim payment from your insurance company, you may be wondering why this payment is significantly less than the cost to repair your property.…

ERISA Disability An experienced Kentucky ERISA disability lawyer can explain why disability insurance and other forms of insurance that are provided through your employer or union fall under a federal law known as The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or “ERISA.” Like many other employee benefits, ERISA disability law is designed to protect…

A pension plan is an employee benefit plan established or maintained by an employer (or employee organization) that provides retirement income for employees. Primarily, pension plans are funded by the employer. More recently, traditional pension plans are becoming less available. Companies have replaced them with alternative plans (like 401(k) retirement savings plans) because they are…

Recently, a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in an action brought against DuPont and Corteva Inc. (defendants). The court held that the Defendants’ motion to dismiss was premature, and that the case could continue through the litigation process. The case concerns the claim brought by employees of DuPont and Corteva…

The First Circuit recently affirmed the position that when a policy or plan is ambiguous, it should be interpreted in favor of the insured. The case that gave rise to the question is Ministeri v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. The facts of the case concern a denial by the Defendant (“Reliance”) for life insurance…

Recently, a federal judge in Texas court ruled in favor of retired NFL player, Michael Cloud, determining that the administrators of The Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan (“Plan”) violated their fiduciary duties under ERISA in denying Cloud a full and fair application review. Cloud’s appeal concerned his eligibility for the highest level of…

The 6th Circuit recently heard a case in which participants in a TriHealth (“Defendants”) 401(k) fund (“Plan”) alleged that the administrators of the Plan breached their fiduciary duty to the participants by offering costly mutual fund options. The 6th Circuit revived one of the class claims, though affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of other claims…